Kice Aspirator Catalogue

AIDS: "The Scourge of the New Millennium"

I wanted to create this article, the presumption not to expose the truth, as always, is never certain, but to put the reader in the same situation where I found myself, when some friends (including Chemists and Biologists) I put a flea in his ear strange, on a sort of "current dissident" about the veracity of information on AIDS and HIV reported in the various bodies who define themselves as "competent".
Starting out of curiosity, I found myself in the situation they could never say with certainty that AIDS is not a maneuver Political and Economic, rather than the Scourge New Millennium, as it often is defined.

the official version
What is HIV infection?

HIV is the human immunodeficiency virus, the organism that causes AIDS. HIV is found in body fluids (especially blood, semen, vaginal secretions, and breast milk) of those infected by the virus. A person can be infected with HIV without even knowing it. It is generally believed that the majority of people infected by HIV get AIDS. However, they may be infected with HIV for many years (often more than 10 years) before contracting AIDS.

AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome) is a condition caused by HIV. It occurs when a person's immune system is weakened by HIV infection, which weakens the body's ability to defend itself from diseases and infections. The health centers of disease control and prevention of AIDS as outlined in a condition caused by a person who: * Has
documented HIV infection in laboratory
* He had a CD4 index (an undefined type of cell that fights infection) less than 200
* Has had one or more of the diseases that cause AIDS

Living with AIDS is like living with any other chronic disease. Sometimes a person with AIDS suffer from infections and feels bad. Other times a person may feel well and can participate in normal activities.

HIV infection is transmitted through blood and bodily fluids
(especially semen, vaginal secretions and breast milk) of infected individuals. It can be transmitted through:

* sexual contact (primarily vaginal or anal intercourse). Transmission by oral sex can happen, but the risk is much lower.

* Blood and other bodily fluids, through:
or exchange of syringes, drugs and the tools of the drug
or receiving transfusions of infected blood or blood products and / or transplantation of organs infected
or drilling tool using the contaminated skin (needles, syringes, razor blades beard needles for tattoos, or circumcision instruments)
or after an injury caused by contaminated needles or other sharp objects or
After receiving a sketch of infected blood or body fluids on mucous membranes (such as eyes)

perinatal Methods * (passed from mother to baby during pregnancy, childbirth or breastfeeding)

Some individuals may not have symptoms and do not know to be infected with HIV. However, they can still transmit the virus to others. You can not say if a person is infected with HIV by just looking.

The probability of being infected with HIV can be reduced by avoiding high-risk behaviors. Abstinence is the only way to avoid acquiring HIV through sexual intercourse. The risk of HIV infection by having sex is low if you have a long-term monogamous relationship with an uninfected person. The best way to prevent HIV is to abstain from unsafe sexual practices and drugs.

What are the symptoms of HIV infection and AIDS?
people infected by HIV infection may not show any symptoms. It takes 10 years or more between HIV infection and AIDS diagnosis. Now, with advances in therapy, this delay time can be extended. Once symptoms begin to develop, which may include:

* An unexplained weight loss that lasts at least a month
* Diarrhea for several weeks or more
* A white coating on the tongue
* enlarged or inflamed glands in the neck, armpits and / or in other parts of the body
* A cough that persists for more than a month
* Persistent fever and / or sweat in the night
* Vaginal infections persistent

Because these symptoms may be caused by other diseases, an examination should be performed to confirm the presence of HIV.

How is it diagnosed HIV infection?
There are blood tests to determine whether a person is infected with HIV. The diagnosis of HIV infection is performed by the discovery of HIV antibody test on a single sample of blood with two different tests, with the second test that can confirm the first. Because these tests instead of looking for antibodies to viruses present, it is possible that during the time between when infection occurs and when antibody levels are high enough to be detected, an HIV test will be negative even if the person is currently infected with HIV. This period of time varies from person to person. So people who think they can be infected have to wait 2-6 months since their last possible exposure before being tested.

Is there a treatment or cure for HIV infection or AIDS?
At present there is no cure for HIV infection and AIDS. However, with the combined use of new antiviral drugs (known as combination therapy) as well as drugs to prevent opportunistic infections, many people with the infection HIV and AIDS have extended and improved the quality of their lives and delayed the progression of HIV to AIDS.

Disease and TEST

The definition of the disease:
It includes a large number of diseases are already known, these are currently as many as 29! These diseases are not always associated with immunodeficiency, AIDS is defined if associated with a positive test. If a person has TB and is HIV positive then, "has AIDS." If, however, has tuberculosis and the test is negative, then he has "only tuberculosis"

A peculiarity of infectious diseases viruses is that they have a single cause (the virus), and obviously can not occur in its absence. So there is no chicken pox virus varicella, measles there is no measles virus and so on. The medical literature has recorded thousands of cases of AIDS were seronegative (ie, the symptoms but the test was negative), and HIV (positive test) in the absence of AIDS.
The reaction to the test, apparently capricious, can bind to health as the disease is often associated with increased non-specific immunoglobulins, which occurs in many situations, as in the course of autoimmune diseases, chronic infection of Malaria, a parasitic disease sometimes even for trivial reasons such as an influenza vaccination.

A person is classified as full-blown AIDS patient when two conditions:
1) the symptoms of at least one of the 29 diseases considered as possible consequences, such as pneumonia, tuberculosis, lymphoma, Diarrhea, Herpes Simplex, sarcoma sarcoma, candidiasis, etc. ..

2) is positive for HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus).

If the subject is a positive test is good but is considered asymptomatic patient. Any subsequent onset of the above will change its classification in full-blown sick. If the person has symptoms one of the diseases listed but is not a positive test is not sick with AIDS. Any subsequent positive response to test change its classification in full-blown sick. Thus a person with pneumonia or tuberculosis negative test is just sick with pneumonia or tuberculosis. While a person with pneumonia or tuberculosis test is positive for the AIDS victim. E 'immediately evident that the HIV test has a central role in the diagnosis of AIDS.

The doctors have been dispossessed of the possibility of making a diagnosis, there is no comparison, there is the possibility for someone to say it and another not. The diagnosis is the only health care system / pharmaceutical patents, approve and produce tests. It 'obvious that the concept of asymptomatic HIV-positive patient is contradictory and that the whole thing is very dangerous: the test decide, beyond all evidence, whether a person is healthy or sick.

In short, none of the tests carried out at present is neither specific nor standardized nor reproducible. But, nevertheless, these tests continue to be used in battery, so they can comfort themselves and supports each other.

Who is Sick with AIDS and those at risk?

despite the warning, AIDS has remained confined groups where there are risk factors for very specific
a) Of the 70,000 Americans who contract AIDS every year, at least 90% appear to be drug addicts (including almost all homosexual patients), while cases of heterosexual reach only 10%. this is in addition to individuals who suffer the negative effects of heroin, cocaine, alcohol, amphetamines and other psychotropic substances, they are fed improperly and inadequate and suffer more or less continuously from multiple infections. Under these conditions of immunosuppression (many drugs have depressant effect on the immune system). The children of mothers addicted to getting away from the uterine toxins mother may have a HIV at birth.
b) homosexuals (about 62% in the USA and 48% in Europe) the problem is the systematic use of multiple drugs, cocaine, ecstasy, alcohol, nitrites inhaled in large doses (nitrites are substances highly reactive, cause immunosuppression, and are used for their aphrodisiac effect, relaxing the sphincter muscles).
c) haemophilia (about 1% to 3% in the U.S. and Europe). Loads of foreign proteins are themselves HIV-positive hemophiliacs in both immunosuppressant that seronegative.

Prostitutes could not avoid becoming victims of designated campaigns propaganda of the guardians of our physical and moral health. Except that, as they spent months, we have seen that the rate of HIV infection was extremely low among the prostitutes. At March 31, 1995, at 27,043 cases related to only 22 prostitutes are not drug addicts (not dependent on the extra security, because those same prostitutes had a high rate of sexual infections).

Millions and millions of African citizens have long suffered from wasting, chronic diarrhea, fever, and cough.

Suddenly, in 1985, Western researchers termed this cluster of symptoms as a distinct syndrome, AIDS, declared that it was caused by a single virus, HIV, which they considered to be sexually contagious.

Earlier this year, however, 24 million Africans are being infected by the virus. In the absence of a medical miracle, nearly all will die before 2010. Every day 6,000 Africans die of AIDS. Every day, 11,000 more are infected.

However, there is the fact that the majority of Africans diagnosed with AIDS (about 70%), is actually negative for HIV.

drugs

The DHHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) from February 5, 2001 has changed the health guidelines for the use of antiretroviral drugs (Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents), saying that perhaps is not the case for use on asymptomatic patients is not clear whether the "benefits" outweigh the toxic effects. He thereby abandoned a therapeutic philosophy in vogue since 1987, when the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has approved the use of AZT, a philosophy summarized in the words "hit hard and hit early" (hit hard and hit early) on the basis of which people-to-positive test absolutely healthy, were put into care with therapies based on drugs allungavita: often death came within a few months. The new guidelines state that therapy is required to report any signs of the disease and not only for HIV status. With this, it is accepted that HIV is no longer a patient and runs no risk. It should be noted that the first HIV test was introduced in 1984 and that year appeared the first intended to become ill with HIV, it was then, within 1-2 years. Over the years, and aging in healthy people infected with HIV who chose not to take antiretroviral drugs and whose life has been "stretched spontaneously", the latency period has been extended inexorably and is now estimated at tens of years. With the latent period As a life long now that the guidelines provide for the health care now had become unjustifiable. It is therefore more sustainable than once that patients "would" die without treatment. Sooner or later someone will have to answer some questions: explain why the positive-to-test asymptomatic until yesterday were terrified, and why those who have accepted care in terror are mostly dead, while those who resisted and have not been treated are alive and have not been sick with AIDS. Example is the story of Christine Maggiore to test-positive asymptomatic since 1992 when the results of a test changed the very young, life. After the shock of the verdict "from 5 to 7 years of life, treatment with AZT immediately, "he began his personal way of the cross between a doctor and another, until about a year after his meeting with the dissidents led her out of the nightmare. Since that time, escaped the health system, has dedicated his life to the cause: with other positive-to-test as she has founded an association "Alive and Well" (alive and well) that is designed to provide information to those who have, as you have done, a choice. He created a website, wrote a book, met a man who loves to have had a baby who is now 5 years. It is always good-to-test. His life was worth to Big Pharma tens of thousands of dollars.

AZT (Azidotimidina, Zidovudine, Retrovir) was developed in 1964 by a researcher from the Cancer Foundation in Detroit, Jerome Horwitz. It 'an altered form of thymine, one of the four nucleotides that make up the strands of our DNA. Unlike in the Thymine has only one link that replacing the original nucleotide prevents the addition of further nucleotides to the filament formation in stalling the process of DNA replication. So AZT, which prevents the cell to copy its DNA it stops the duplication process, and prevents the formation of new cells. AZT does not differentiate between healthy cells, cancerous or virus. So if one side can stop the duplication of those who are ill or viruses, blocks all other destroying vital body processes. The substance turned out to be so toxic (lethal) that Horwitz did not even asked for the patent, and filed documents. AZT came out of the dust in 1986 and was approved by the FDA in 1987 after a fraud trial (see Poison by Prescription: The AZT Story - John Lauritsen). Among the consequences of the administration of AZT are: destruction of the immune system, destruction of bone marrow, and tissue destruction of the intestinal flora, atrophy of muscles, liver damage to the pancreas to the skin to the nervous system lymphoma. In the category of pseudo-nucleotides are part of the next addition to AZT 3TC (Epivir), d4T (Zerit), ddC (Hivid) ddI (Videx) and ABC (Ziagen): their operation is similar, as are the consequences. Since 1996 the use of a single drug was replaced by a "cocktail" of drugs (HAART - Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy) by combining the pseudo nucleotides protease inhibitors, an enzyme necessary for the separation of protein segments. Thus, once again prevent the biological activity is necessary to the formation of new copies of the virus to the proper functioning of our cells, with devastating toxic effects. Fall into this category: Invirase, Fortovase, Agenerase, Kaletra. If HIV-AIDS was a death sentence without appeal of virus, as the official theory supports the use of antiretroviral substances whose toxic properties are evident and recognized, it might seem like a necessary evil. But if you like, say the dissidents, not the cause of AIDS is a virus, then the administration of antiretroviral substances is a criminal act, genocide, committed as follows:

* Positive-to-test asymptomatic dead were killed by the health system with devastation and untold suffering.
* Positive test asymptomatic-to-live: the health care system are subject to damage and suffering and unjustifiable risk of death.
* Positive-to-test proclaimed dead; some would die anyway, but without an extra dose of devastation and suffering, others with appropriate treatment could heal and are also victims of the health system.
* Positive-to-test acclaimed live: they are not treated properly, the health care system are subject to damage and suffering and unjustifiable risk of death.

According to Lauritsen, who conducted the in-depth analysis on the subject, about half of people treated with antiretroviral substances belong to the group of positive-to-test perfectly healthy before the "cure." At the moment there are hundreds of thousands of people in the world are administered substances antiretrovirals. Fortunately, antiretroviral doses of substances have been lightened over the years, and that the administration was continued in the early years is now in cycles: this has greatly reduced the mortality of subjects away from a rate that was close to 100% for several years.

But then the virus exists or not ...?

One of the tenets of genetics.
According to the classical theory, assuming the lower half of the '70s, the flow of information used to form a protein could go in one direction: from the genetic code (DNA) to protein in formation through an intermediate molecule (messenger RNA). DNA -> RNA -> PROTEIN.
In 1970 it was discovered in extracts of certain cells, an enzyme (a biological catalyst) capable of converting the molecule of RNA into DNA. This was a revolutionary discovery radically changed since a fundamental principle of molecular genetics and that is that the flow of information was strictly one way. According to that theory, in fact, the DNA was transcribed into messenger RNA and the reverse process RNA-> DNA could not occur.
The newly discovered enzyme was known as "reverse transcriptase" (in truth was only discovered enzyme activity) and immediately thought it was to be the index of the presence of a new type of virus.

Having transcriptase activity found in cancer cells had widely accept the idea that they were present in RNA viruses, they could fit into cellular DNA by the enzyme believed their exclusive and possibly cause carcinogenic transformation host cell. These hypothetical entities were called retroviruses.
The idea that these viruses cause cancer and others opened up great expectations and high hopes around the world and soon led to acknowledge the spread of infectious agents of cancer homosexual prostitutes and black, as was the case in recent years for AIDS. It is also believed that a vaccine could give protection to them.
But the theory was not able to explain the epidemiology of cancer and their apparent lack of transmissibility. No vaccine could be achieved.
So, in the 70s at any time and any place, the reverse transcriptase activity was revealed indication that retroviruses were present. This also proved to be a serious mistake, because the same enzyme activity was present in all living matter thus proving that the reverse transcriptase had nothing to do with the retrovirus itself. This was already known in the early '80s.
However, many scientists took account of this evidence and continued to work intensively on the assumption now forged.
A subsequent search showed that at least 10% of mammalian DNA was composed of repetitive sequences which were referred to as "nonsense genes" (ie no apparent function), however, some of which had sequences similar to those attributed retroviruses. They are hundreds if not thousands of copies in each cell. They can multiply independently and later jump between chromosomes, they were defined retrotransposon. In the lab you can get them to migrate and when this happens the business Reverse transcriptase is invariably found. It also showed that normal cellular enzymes could be an efficient reverse transcriptase activity (9). For all these reasons, the equation "= retrovirus reverse transcriptase" was completely dropped.

All this was already well known in 1983. Nevertheless, Gallo and Montagnier in 1984 declared that he had discovered a new virus, although they did all that was summarized in the following points:

1) found signs of transcriptase activity in cell cultures,
2) showed photographs of particles virus-like virus with no evidence that they were,
3) alterations found themselves in the same cell cultures, changes that could also be found in cell cultures "uninfected."

The above attribute it to the virus in a hypothetical hypothetical hypothetical proposed as being responsible for AIDS.
Gallo's group, in fact, did not bring any evidence that the transcriptase activity nor the cell changes observed were caused by viruses that had not isolated. In addition, his works were completed with gross fraud and corruption.
In initial work, Montagnier's group maintains the cautious conclusion that: "The role of viruses in the etiology of AIDS is to be determined." This however, not kept them to announce to the world (the famous April 23, 1984) and the following days he had found the probable cause of AIDS. As is known, however, even that last caution, the adjective "probable" quickly dissolved into nothingness, leaving the place all'incrollabile, rocky sure that everyone has been inculcated.

Since then I have passed many years, yet no picture of a virus particle or its isolated protein and its nucleic acid has been published. Since the early studies of Gallo claimed to have found HIV in high concentrations (108/ml). So there is no technical justification for such failure. No control (such as those mentioned above) was performed. What the world has seen two things: a) photographs of virus-like particles from cultured cells stimulated with hormones and oxidizing agents, conditions that certainly does not occur in vivo, b) more or less stylized depictions of what would like it to be. In the only controlled study of electron microscopy, the results puzzling to the proponents of the theory of viral particles indistinguishable consisted in the discovery of HIV in a variety of diseases of the lymphatic system, not associated with HIV, so that the authors were led to conclude: "The presence of such particles, by itself, does not indicate infection with HIV."
existence is inferred from a HIV antibody test, but how this would work when HIV has not been demonstrated that there is a mystery. But you can imagine what it shows just thinking about how Gallo got his test.

Direct evidence of HIV
Some researchers have attempted to circumvent the problem of non-viral isolation pointing to something called "direct evidence of the virus." But they have done nothing but select a protein of a certain size that can match that demonstrated in models of HIV. In the end he had to admit that the protein was of cellular origin.
Despite this deplorable state of affairs, the majority of researchers continue to believe in the authenticity of HIV as a "gene sequence" of it was published. The existing genetic procedures have the advantage of identifying the presence of HIV, more or less directly in the absence of antibodies. The fact that "genetic tests are sometimes negative when antibodies are present or the culture is positive," is simply ignored. In addition, the central objection is not overcome even that, because no virus was isolated, it follows that no viral genome has been isolated from it. In the literature, however, complicated procedures described at the end of which is produced "something" that is then called the HIV genome.
This can be achieved by what is produced by very special conditions in the laboratory which also include the use of cell lines "immortalized" cells extracted from the patient and "enriched" by stimulating and oxidizing agents exist in vivo . These conditions (called co-cultures) are in themselves sufficient to account for reverse transcriptase activity and the formation of new DNA (presumed viral).
The real explanation of what happens is as follows. RNA is transcribed into segments of DNA of varying degrees. Some of those may seem foreign to the cell of origin because they are much more long messenger RNA (present only in short segments). They are the result of the reverse transcription process that knits together unrelated pieces of newly formed DNA (template switching). This has led researchers to believe that the normal was the product of the viral DNA.
The pieces of DNA that result are invariably shorter and longer than the "correct" length of HIV. Pieces corresponding to the desired length should be selected so as not to violate the cardinal rule of virology to the effect that all the nucleic acids in a particular virus to be identical.

A process of identification with the use of a probe "to measure".
Having prepared pieces of DNA of uniform length, they are not yet ready for presentation since they consist of a mixture too diverse to represent a single type of DNA. E 'therefore need to make a selection, and authentication. This process is called hybridization.
The use of gene probes (small chains of nucleic acids, obtained in the laboratory) for hybridization can detect the presence of DNA segments of the type sought. Since the beginning of the story of course there was no genetic probe of HIV, Gallo and Montagnier in the following way:

1) cultivated and stimulated cells from from patients who allegedly harbored an infection with the virus to be identified;
2) interpreted the appearance of a certain enzyme activity (reverse transcriptase) in crops as evidence of the presence of the virus;
3) single-like particles viral culture in the sections appeared to researchers as a further confirmation of their hypothesis.

At this point the supernatant of the culture was centrifuged, the material was taken as a hypothesis-always - had the characteristics of sedimentation of the virus. Were found proteins and RNA segments, some of them were arbitrarily selected, cloned and presented as viral genomes and viral proteins. Without any proof that this was true.

To summarize, the intent was to grow and get HIV by separating its proteins and their nucleic acids. Instead, it was obtained a mixture of different pieces of DNA, which, if viral, should have been identical. Some arbitrarily selected segments were then constructed with a gene probe based on a hypothesis. However, chains that do not hybridize should not be present and the fact that there are proves that you have chosen a cell's DNA from all the "repetitive elements." It follows that the so-called DNA of HIV can only be an artifact of laboratory built in accordance with a preconceived idea of \u200b\u200bwhat retroviral DNA should be and on a hypothesis (= retroviruses reverse transcriptase activity) already forged during the '70s. Let us remember that today is considered positive when a culture is revealed that enzyme activity

important event for the AIDS

The May 1, 2000 the White House and has declared a ' AIDS a threat to national security, and thereby gave a mandate to the CIA to handle the matter officially. It is natural to think that the threat is represented by the spread of the epidemic in the U.S., but it is not: data from the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) show that cases of AIDS have fallen dramatically in recent years, and about 30% from their peak years of 92/93. The problem is not the growth of the phenomenon, but as far as it may appear paradoxical and grotesque, the exact opposite, its possible disappearance. Are now so massive economic, political and bureaucratic interests related to HIV that his untimely death would upset many equilibria:

* 100,000 researchers and clinicians, largely Americans, have careers and salaries linked to the virus.
* more than 1000 associations collect a total of billions of euros a year to help AIDS patients.
* Tens of thousands of millions of euros per year fatten the budgets of the multinational drug companies by selling drugs life-saving antiretroviral drugs and HIV tests (ELISA, Western Blot, Viral Load) *
organizations such as USAID (U.S. International Development Agency) UNAIDS (United Nations AIDS program), WHO (World Health Organization), receive annual appropriations of billions of euros to fight AIDS. The UN has just requested a budget of 10 billion euros to tackle the emergency.

The court of Dortmund, January 15, 2001, issued a sentence to eight months, suspended sentence, in proceedings for Genocide Act (§ 220a StGB) against the Health Authority and against the German Federal Parliament of Germany. Health authorities were accused of spreading false information and photos relating to the isolation of HIV, the German Parliament was accused of having gone along with these lies even though he was aware since 1994 that the HIV virus has never been isolated, and that therefore no test could be approved and used to define the infected people, healthy pre-test are then death after treatment with antiretroviral drugs. The prosecution's case, namely that Montagnier (1983) they Gallo (1984) had isolated any virus in connection with AIDS and that the Bundestag since 1994, was aware of this fact has been established on the basis of a document recorded in the archives of the German Bundestag DS 12/8591 numbers with the same

Brazilian Waxing Shapes Images

The Lords of War

The Lords of War

Node trade between Africa and Asia since ancient times (witness the Egyptian Fifth Dynasty), the Islamized Somalia was in the seventh century, through the establishment of trade centers of Arab Zeila, Mogadishu and Brava. The merger between Semites and Hamites led to the formation of the Kingdom of Ifat in the fourteenth century, which suffered the influences of the nearby Abyssinian civilization. The whole region was conquered
the Christian kingdom of Shoa and recovered with the formation of the kingdom of Adel at the beginning of the sixteenth century and with the advance of the Ottoman Turks. Divided into local Muslim rulers, formally dependent on Zanzibar, entered the colonial aims in Europe following the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869: in 1884, occupied GranBretagna Zeila, Bulhar and Berbera, while France took possession of Djibouti, most the country became the Italian colony after several treaties with the sultans of Obbie and Migiurtinia in 1889. Italy won in 1889, an agreement by the Italian Consul in Aden with their sultans, the protectors of the sultanate Obbie and that of Migiurtina. In 1892 the Sultan of Zanzibar granted rent ports Benadir (including Mogadishu and Brava) Filonardi trading company. The Benadir, although run by a private company, was tapped by the Kingdom of Italy as the base for expeditions to the mouth of the Jubba and the Omo and the assumption of a protectorate over the town of Lugh. In March 1902, the Benadir Soc submit to Parliament a comprehensive and coordinated program of action that then leads to employment of Barder and Lugh, the establishment of a transportation service, ground and sea and a treaty with the Sultan of Ghelédi. The Italian military forces in that country are very small and consist only of local bands set up in Yemen or controlled by Italian and Eritrean. Two years later, the crisis business of the Company and the restrictive policy of Benadir Italian who took action against the slavery of the Arab tribes of the coast, led to the first clash with the faction of Bimal in market area. Our allegations of slavery considered unfounded fears of invasion and leads to the termination of the mullahs with the Benadir Soc. In fact, however, Italy had replaced the Company for some months. Over the next four years will number two wars against the tribes.

In January 13, 1905 agreement between Italy and England to Italy redeems the four Somali airports in exchange for a lump sum payment of 144,000 pounds for the government of Zanzibar. By another agreement, the rent England Italy a plot of land in the Bay of Kismayo. The land is used for constructing a sbarcatoio and cargo sheds. The same year he proclaimed the Italian colony of Somalia to the northeast and south.
In September 1907, Menelik autoincoironato King of Kings of Ethiopia, sent an expedition to extort taxes. After being rejected for the first time by men of the Mullah, he manages to reach the wells of Lugh Berdal at starting a series of raids. The captains and Bongiovanni Molinari with 300 men decide to take action in order to peacefully return the loot. Reached Bahallè are forced to fight by the Abyssinians, and there are death.
The excesses made in raids will be punished by the same Menelik. Following these events ending in Addis Ababa a treaty for the demarcation of borders between Ethiopia and Italian Somalia. In practice, however, the boundaries were fixed only by Dolo (south) to let. The English grand'offensiva against Mullah ends with the escape of the latter in the territory of Nogal. He died at the high Imi Uebi in 1921. In Italy meanwhile, is founded in Milan the Italo-Somali Agricultural Society on the initiative of HRH The Duke of Abruzzi. England gives Jubaland post-war Italy as compensation. In July of the following starting operations for employment under the General Commissariat of Jubaland dell'Oltregiuba. Somalia has not become a colony of settlement, indeed the capital Mogadishu certainly will not come to the size of "Italian" in Asmara, reaching a count - a maximum of Italian immigration - not more than 10,000 Italians.
The region was an integral part of the Ogaden Somali territory before it was sold to the Ethiopian King Menelik II, who in 1887 went to Berlin to beg the great powers at an outlet to the sea. The three signatories to Italy, Britain and France during the years 1884-1886 gave the Ogaden as a reward to? Ethiopia not to have hindered the search for territorial concessions in the Horn of Africa.

Siad Barre: Somali political and military. President of Somalia (1969-1991). In 1976 he founded the Somali Revolutionary Socialist Party. The progressive loss of consensus led him to an increasingly authoritarian policy that would strengthen the internal opposition.

With the establishment of the empire, the former Ethiopian Ogaden, it is placed back in the province of Somalia. Scoppiatala Second World War, Somalia was occupied by British troops who crossed the border dell'Oltregiuba, 27 February 1941 entered the capital Mogadishu, taking on the administration and setting up separate the Ogaden territory. The Ogaden Ethiopia was finally made. In the south, the British made similar gifts to the Somali region of Kenya NFD (North District Front). The British occupation of Somaliland lasted until March 31, 1950, when it became independent. The Ogaden in Somali history is the region where battles are fought.

Somalia, to Italian authorities, in turn, became independent on 1 July 1960 and there was the union of two former colonies.
In 1967, Aden Abdullah Osman Daar in elections fought by Abdi Rashid Ali Shirmarke. The President Shermarke is assassinated by one of his bodyguards.

General Mohamed Siad Barre took power in a military coup a few days later.
Sid Barre, the son of a pastor, in 1941 he entered the territorial police force, during the fifties he attended a course in Italy ufficiali.Dopo for the independence of Somalia (1960) made his career in the army, to become commander in chief. In 1970, Siad Barre declares Somalia a socialist state and nationalized much of the economy .
In July 1977, the low-intensity warfare between rebels backed by Somali government and Ethiopian army is transformed into a conflict between Somalia and Ethiopia. The theater the fighting is the Ethiopian region of Ogaden.
Ogaden, in '77 was fought one of the bloodiest conventional wars in history. The
Somalia under the leadership of dictator Siad Barre tried to wrest the arid region of Ethiopia, the Soviet army commanded by General Vasily Petrov and Lieutenant General of Aviation G. Dolnikov jointly led by the Cuban Division General Arnaldo Ochoa (later shot by Castro for drug trafficking), established a Joint Staff in Mengistu was the political leader. The Ethiopian armed forces consisted of five Ethiopian General, Cuban 8, 5 2 Soviet Yemen (Yemen sent 2,000 soldiers), 50,000 Ethiopian soldiers assisted by 18,000 Cubans, Israeli pilots on the F5, the Cuban pilots and Yemeni MiG.

using a massive airlift of military information in addition to the Cubans and Soviets who had until then armed the regime of Mohamed Siad Barre, in the space of a year the Ethiopians drove back the Somali from positions won, defeating them in battle and of Diredaua Giggig. He remained popular with the transaction which the Russians jumped the line Somali transferred to a huge mass of helicopters entire motorized division.

Following the defeat in the conflict with Ethiopia to control the Ogaden, Siad Barre, suspended diplomatic relations with the USSR and in 1978 brought the country into the orbit West, and in March 1978, a group of army officers seeking to overthrow the regime of Siad Barre without success.
One of the originators of the attempted coup of 1978, Colonel Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmad is one of the founders of the first movement of armed opposition to the regime of Siad Barre: the Somali Salvation Front (FSS), which in 1981 became the Front Somali Salvation Democratic (FDSS). Ysuf is its leader.
May 1988: The Somali National Movement (MNS) unleashed an offensive in the north. Siad Barre responds by bombing the region. Hundreds of thousands of civilians are displaced and many lose their lives. It 's the first real challenge to the regime of Siad Barre. In May 1990: In Mogadishu has published a manifesto which calls for convening a reconciliation conference. The sign 144 personalities of the country, representing all Somali clans.

since 1980 in the northern provinces remained active anti-government guerrillas, the expression of several opposition movements and various ethnic groups, born in December 1990 with the outbreak in Mogadishu in an armed revolt that January 27 1991, after heavy fighting, overthrew the government and forced Siad Barre to flee.
The provisional government established failed to quell the fighting between different factions that brought the country into a state of serious crisis.

The November 17, 1991, begins the war between the two factions of the output ( U nited S Omali C ONGRESS ) ; in April 1992 began the mission UNOSOM I and the troops Restore Hope mission arrived in Somalia. In March 1993, the agreements are signed in Mogadishu, which provide for the holding of democratic elections and the establishment of a legitimate government by popular vote. We will not never applied.

In fact, in June (1993), the peacekeeping forces are attacked by the men of General Aidid, in July (1993), an American helicopter killed more than 50 Somalis gathered in a private house in Mogadishu, increasing hostility towards the international intervention forces, and in October (1993), the militia of General Aidid shot down a U.S. helicopter Rangers engaged in mopping-up operation. Again, March 24, 1994, Ali's generals, and Madie Aidid signed the Declaration of national reconciliation, promising to end the hostilities. The agreement will never be applied. UN forces retreat in Somalia finally ending March 28, 1995 to 'Operation Restore Hope.

The situation policy in Somalia in late 1995 was very unstable. The State is divided into two nations in 1991, the capital, Mogadishu, is divided geographically by a 'green line' separating the cut virtually in half. Inside, other 'clan' share out the power of the city and the North, though formally under the control of Ali Mahdi, is in the hands of Islamic fundamentalists, who impose the law of Shari'a, while in the South, General Aidid holds the power of the other half of Mogadishu. Paradoxically, after the UN intervention, the political situation look worse. Somalia has now two heads of state: in June 1995 Gen. Aidid declared himself president, alongside the existing Interim President Ali Mahdi. The various parties in Somalia are also divided among themselves: Aidid was in fact discouraged USC-SNA (United Somali Congress-Somali National Alliance) by Ali "Atto", his right arm, pushed by the latter purpose of increasing cooperation with rival factions.
In August 2000 a national reconciliation conference held in Djibouti confined Abdiqasim Salad Hassan was elected the first president of the Somali national government since 1991. But from the beginning this is facing stiff resistance from various armed groups, especially degi Rahanwein Resistance Army (RRA) led by Hassan Mohamed Nur, supported by neighboring Ethiopia. Since 1994 Somalia has been left to itself and its uncertain fate.

To understand the nature of the conflict must consider the historical heritage and development of traditional Somali society. The population belongs to one ethnic group and shares a single religion. It can not therefore speak dilotte tribal, meaning that conflicts between ethnic groups is completely different and we must instead consider the conflict 'classist', and 'clans' inside the same nation. The companies 'clan' is not generally the prelude to an anarchist society and, importantly, almost never leads to a conflict. Although the socio-political pre-colonial Somali is highly decentralized, there existed and still exists today, an efficient regulatory system between clans (guurti, or assemblies of elders, who are the legitimate representatives of clans and sub-clan).

The roots of the dissolution of the Somali State are to be found in more recent times, considering the effects of the dictatorship of General Siad Barre (1969-1991), the 'Cold War', the management of Italian aid and international intervention. The State of Somalia became independent July 1, 1960. Nine years later, namely in October 1969, the policy of the country was disrupted by the coup that brought him to the head the country ('Somali Democratic Republic'), General Siad Barre. The second half of the sixties saw the army star on the political scene throughout the African continent, the Western political institutions typically left behind by colonialism were weak and unable to function in a democratic manner.

In this context, where it wants to impose a form of governance-style "democratic West", the only thing that can give the power "state" is the army or the army in the context stronger, when thousands of years are the clan to take the scepter and the country's traditional social order and the same CLAN are instigated with useless excuses of unification under one flag or religious ideology and the game gradually slipped from the hands of the real RULERS Soamlia, into the hands of those who support the arms trade and those who foment a war and a continuous friction, Clan spokespersons making dell'idealogia handled on duty.

So who are the true Lords of War?