EnergY
Charcoal was not enough and the oil is running out now, maybe it would not have lasted as expected, but this matters little to those who have enriched, and there are many, in all economic sectors
should be immediately think of an alternative form of energy! It is certainly so, now we have to run for cover, changing facilities, change the powers, changing the "monopolist" development (which is not human) has the base change. Change the means, change cars, change prices until ...
... until you change the energy again, digging ruining, destroying, resetting this world that now belongs only to man in excessive surplus, fully use the space, within a generation.
Then we want to do so or believe that it is so?
Before you jump immediately to board lifeboats represented by alternative energy sources, the use of which would allow us to maintain the current standard of living, do not think it would be wise to ensure they float?
Indeed, the oil is low, matter of years, may be 5, 10 or even 20 but soon the oil will be uneconomical to be taken and then will be gradually abandoned in favor of other energy sources.
And this is the crucial point. What will this new source?
Candidates are varied and below I will give a brief overview of the main.
Coal: There are huge reservoirs, but pollutes a lot, you can use any modern technology: it is a fossil-rich residual carbon then at least bring huge amounts of greenhouse gases. And this is not acceptable.
Nuclear Energy Classical (fission, nuclear power stations): This produces high-energy density and how much he wants. The very big problem is the safety of power plants, the huge amount of radioactive waste that are created (now stored in tanks around the world who knows when that will begin to lose all these ...), handling radioactive waste are a constant and real threat not only to humanity but his complete for the entire life of the entire planet.
And now there are hydrogen and methane. But be very careful. Hydrogen is not 'an energy source. Hydrogen can be seen as an accumulator, a method of storage and conservation of energy produced by some other means, either clean (solar, wind, biomass) or classic (coal, oil, gas). This is to be kept in mind.
But then, how and why people are talking about "clean hydrogen", "zero emissions", "hydrogen future"?
The medium is the misinformation (the most widely used non-conventional weapons in recent years), which can be sold by the media due to the substantial ignorance of the people on these topics are quite technical. The motive which leads to peddle these lies is very, very important for the status quo and can be summed up in one word: CONTROL.
Let me explain. Hydrogen can not be done at home, is complex to handle, it takes tremendous technology and capital throughout the structure that supports it creates and uses: it needs a system to be used. Exactly how it happened and still happens to oil.
The hydrogen is monopolized, it is controllable and then creates a commodity to be sold, you can decide the price at which to sell it, you may want to get it burning coal or the Amazon rainforest and must carry it, you have to build pipelines, distributors, power plants where to create it, store it. So a precise and exact copy of the entire system oil.
But, you say, it is said that hydrogen will be produced from clean sources and if so would be really neat.
It 's true, but unfortunately the amount of hydrogen could be created from renewable sources is too small and expensive to be seriously taken as the primary means. There may be special cases, like Iceland, where, thanks to the rich presence of geothermal energy and water you can really get large amounts of hydrogen cleanly. But unfortunately, these cases are rare and confined to a few realities.
The same is possible for hydrogen, methane is applicable to "natural gas" there's more but this will soon disappear, the world's thirst for energy and gas has a low energy density (ie for every pound of gas produces little energy).
just happened on the biggest pipeline project that would connect the former USSR and the USA, but passes right under Afghanistan's former Taliban government had always been opposed to its construction. Italy got shares of Enel's Russian gas companies (companies Putin and other members of his government) to meet, not to poor service delivery as they said the mass media, but why should sell the hypothetical redundancies production enregia methane to nearby France. What do the houses car when they sell the cars to CNG as the solution of the future? Do you think that methane is eternal? Methane, must be drawn, it goes fine, go conveyed, transported and finally go to be used by the central authorities to CNG, or in the case of automobiles, must be sold in special sites, the same way as oil.
So what? We will find ourselves once again faced with a monopoly power that makes the good and the bad weather as and when it wants?
No!
solution already exists, not even the only, but it certainly is the most important one that can really bring humanity to a system limited monopoly power and the abundance of clean, safe and localized.
has a name, a name with an accurate job of the media and economic power will make you a little smile on his lips: COLD FUSION
On 25 March 1989 and the historic day in which two brave researchers at the University of Salt Lake City (Utah - USA), Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons announced to the press to have found a very simple and inexpensive to produce clean energy: energy derived from fusion of deuterium atoms (isotopes of hydrogen) at low temperature. In essence, the energy of the future. Although two well-documented findings of scientists have subsequently played in over two hundred laboratories around the world, triggered a series of controversies inconceivable and something more. A campaign of contempt, in particular, was basted by their colleagues, students of the hot melt, so named because it requires millions of degrees of temperature and also of huge economic resources. And even the press and magazines turned heavy criticism for their actions. The result was that, after the earthquake triggered the enthusiasm for the revolutionary announcement was followed by a growing skepticism, boundless in precise threats to the two researchers. They disappeared for a few months, until they landed in Nice. Here are still working on their project in a private laboratory funded with nine million dollars from the IMRA Europe SA, a company affiliated to the Japanese Toyota. In the titanic struggle of interests of all kinds, the scientific movement resulted from cold fusion is still alive and achievements are truly hold in the highest regard, despite the fact that they produce energy like heat, ie a non noble, but still blessed . In addition, researchers meet annually to exchange views and results. Unlike the technique studied and carried forward 40 years to implement the hot melt of hydrogen atoms, using huge machines able to get the inside temperature even hundreds of millions of degrees, the cold fusion by Fleischmann and Pons proposal is based on electrolysis and uses simple equipment. By passing electricity between two electrodes, one of palladium and another platinum immersed in heavy water D2 0 (where D is the symbol of deuterium) can produce as much energy much higher than that. According to what has previously been found in the crystal lattice of the Palladio you create a form of merger between the deuterium nuclei.
in recent years and have developed new techniques like the use of special devices on the electrodes especially the use of ordinary water. Yes, your tap water. Surprising results show energy efficiency by as much as 900%. To some this does not go very well. And then you create problems: we are rich in dance patents and the Nobel Prize. The theories of "science" feel the smell of money in circulation. secondary is not the economic problem: what, among other things, whether the nuclear reaction adversely welfare to the entire world population and at the same time solve the growing pollution of the planet? Unfortunately, we realize that the real problem is the man. Certainly the spirit is sick. A spirit that has brought science into a dead end where the wisdom is still evanescent. The question arises then: is it possible today, and it was possible in previous decades put things in their proper places to give a better future for our children? The answer is surely yes, but it is the will of the man who must take action to bring out concrete and dignity. Historical analysis of this story we can understand how the choices they have such a situation, where self-interest or lobby, has always prevailed over that of the community. Therefore, the way of producing energy by the method of combustion has always had the upper hand, but the means to changing them could have already since the twenties and even earlier.
course, in Italy there are some universities who studied the phenomenon. Among the Italian researchers, we must mention, no doubt, prof. Giuliano Preparata, one of the men still capable of fighting for cold fusion and denounce the dangerous situation of cover-up and especially the 'entrapment' ingenuity of Fleischmann and Pons. He recently said: "The fact that cold fusion is a small science, and therefore difficult to govern by the scientific and financial oligarchs, has allowed, in spite of all the growth to the point that now seems very unlikely that it disappears into thin air, without bringing to maturity in a few years the ideas that allow large-scale industrial exploitation. "In the past eight years, in fact, research has reached an acceptable level in search of create cheap energy without the nightmare of pollution or other gadgets like. But when the results might have already industrial application, a mind is invisible yet succeeded in stopping the most daring. consoled by the fact that many scientists, the new apprentices alchemists, they had in their minds the will to make life easier and healthier than their neighbors. Nature is still not fully reveals its secrets This is because the man's material still does not accept the laws of the spirit. And 'we untie a knot that sooner or later because the evolution of man deals with the profound knowledge of life in all its expressions in many forms, and the laws that govern it. Remains indelibly in my mind a statement made by a famous Italian scientist, Gianfranco Pantellini Vals: "Mendeleev spoke of light elements, elements medium and heavy elements. All current atomic physics is based on the use of heavy elements. But the foundations of physics ATOMIC NATURE, the basic mechanism that allows the flow of life is just given by the light elements and their susceptibility transmute low energy. "
E 'for many years that cold fusion, in addition to work, be reproducible, controllable and, more importantly, understood and explained.
rendimentiintorno With it you get to 1,000%, extracting heat from melting at room temperature with nuclear tools and knowledge used by almost anyone since the material that is used is that of a simple chemical laboratory. Moreover, the cost is really insignificant because it speaks of numbers around 300 euro to get about 10 Kw / h per well 500 years and all without producing any residual nuclear radiation or any harmful pollution.
you can have a very scientific discovery, reproducible and that works, this means that you can have all the energy we need wherever there is no need to have to CARRY. You can create in situ. It needs no centralization. Never exist in a central cold fusion.
I need hot water? I do not need either because of a water heater with a "stack" to cold fusion on the size of a fingernail placed on each faucet in my house (so cheap!), I can have hot water when and how much you want it!
There is no need to transport energy (think of the elimination of all power lines!), Storing it, to build expensive power plants. You should NOT There is a supplier of electricity because you will yourself to provide energy when and where and how much you want!
portable power, clean and plentiful ... seems like a miracle! (A bit 'of years ago, Carlo Rubbia said these words: If cold fusion does not mean that God has been very, very good to us). Well, God, nature, the universe is structured to be able to live in abundance.
Think of all the plants that exist, how many kinds of living beings, in many colors, the infinite grandeur of the universe ... and I think the abundance of energy that we can use, so why continue to live in poverty?
0 comments:
Post a Comment